Content license details
This page on Substack exists to clarify the legal side of reusing content from my WordPress.com/Substack/mirror.xyz blog into your work.
TL;DR
- Text + graphics I made are licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0, unless otherwise noted.
- Code snippets I made are licensed under a separate license to avoid license conflicts hellscape and due to non-suitability of CC licenses on software and source code, the MIT license, unless otherwise noted. (As always, check the
SPDX-License-Identifier
comment header and embed captions.) - Anything else is not covered by this policy, including embedded content. Make sure to check the image caption and additional editor notes at the end of a blog post for credits.
- When in doubt, don’t ask to ask. Just ask about your situation to one of my contact details. In case you want to reuse my content without attribution, a one-time monetary compensation might be required on a case-by-case basis.
Text and graphics from ~ajhalili2006
Text and graphics (if they’re originally made by himself) in blog posts from Andrei Jiroh are licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 (see legal code). Any third-party content, including the ones he paid through commissions, will be labelled as such.
Source code
Source code is a tricky hellscape to use CC BY-SA, especially for Stack Overflow/Exchange users, since:
- it doesn’t mention source code and patents (AKA license proliferation shitfuckery)
- isn’t compatible with major software licenses (other than one-way compatibility with GPL)
While the MIT license might also experience the license proliferation shitfuckery issue
What if I need to reuse content, but without credit? (or anything else)
Just ask. Depending on your use case, you might be asked to pay a one-time monetary compensation to cover custom licensing costs, which can be negotiable on your inquiry.
For third-party content in blog posts, look for credits to get information about who and where to contact.